| 25 Jun 2000 | Tanos | Very, very good detail and shading on this one. I have little to say, because it's so good! And you hafta email me and tell me how you did your textures... they're what makes the pic so realistic! Awesome stuff. | |
| 21 Jan 2002 | Jayme A. Mallonee | This one is very good! Um... the hand that's cluthing the sword? It kinda looks like it's handing the sword to someone. But the colors are REALLY good! | |
| 22 Feb 2002 | Edward 'Edge' C. Arvidson | The sword-hand is in a rather odd position, but overall this is quite good with an astounding attention to detail. I'm glad the close-up version was available, when I saw the original scan I was almost ready to bet money that he was standing on his own tail! Now I see that I was mistaken, but the wings that looked good before look even better now. It's amazing what change in perspective can bring to light. | |
| 18 May 2002 | Christopher R. Yost | Yes, the lose up helps the picture. The full picture seemed kinda off...anyway. The sword does look better now. His hands seem kinda off though, might want to work on that. Other than that, very good. | |
| 20 May 2002 | Frances Gibbs | This one is quite good.. the sword is in the wrong hand, however. either that, or the scabbard is hanging on the wrong side, because it would be quite awkward to draw from that angle... and the hand is a little off, yeah. well, sorry 'bout all the criticism.. I shouldnt really, coz this is a really nice drawing ; )  Alice Hsieh (Changewinds) replies: "Hehe didn't really think about logistics when I drew this one, was mainly going for a realy neat looking armor. " | |
| 23 May 2002 | Frances Gibbs | Eh, sorry! I tend to pick up on little details like that.. Yeah, the armour is cool! | |