| 14 Sep 2006 | Streetcat | Actually, seraphs would make a poor subject of erotic art, since they're described as only using two wings for flight, whereas another pair covers their loins {for reasons of "decency", presumably} and a third pair covers their eyes {to avoid seeing God}. I still like your work, though! | |
| 22 Sep 2006 | Anonymous | "Seraphim" is the plural, the singular is "seraph". It's Hebrew. | |
| 10 Nov 2006 | Anonymous X | Still Streetcat i'm sure you wouldn't mind if she came around. Also if you want to get technical a seraph is the equivalent of a messenger or a bureaucrat.
I wouldn't mind seeing his version of a avenging angel.(Flaming sword and armor) | |
| 20 Mar 2007 | Anonymous | did you know that thats how some angels are described in the bible? the angel has 3 sets of wings: the first near the head to hide the eyes, the second to cover something else ( I don't remenmber) and the third set to hide the feet. just thougth you wanted to know.... love the pic! | |
| 27 Apr 2008 | Kevin savage1 watson | I thought that wings were for flying. | |
| 9 May 2008 | NinjaWarlordOfNi | @Anonymous: The second set of wings are for flight, not for covering anything. Just thought I help.
Awesome picture, she wouldn’t happen to be related to the Angel/Griffin cross-breeds, eh? | |
| 9 Jun 2008 | Shelby *Raven* Lynn | finally a lady with a face of perfect serenity, a body well proportioned and i envy her wings | |
| 18 Jun 2008 | Daniël Rooth | very nice pic, good posing and well proportioned like said before only i thought angels were described as genderless creatures (or so i heard) and thats because priests in the old days said they were beautifull creatures (which most religeous persons would think of to be female) BUT they didnt want women to have such a high function! this is what i heard at least   still great pic, great artist | |
| 17 Jul 2008 | Karolina Mattsson | I love the wings! | |
| 24 Jul 2008 | Anon. | | |