| 27 Oct 2003 | Sarah N. Rizzo | wow, you have a talent with shading. But there's something that's irking me about this drawing. in the nude study, his right arm is way too big for his body and for that angle. Another thing, you should really complete the nude, too. I was all like "omg! a nekkid guy!", and as i srcoll down, it seems that someone has....er...eaten his bagel. otherwise, tis a lurvely pic. *hands ye a cookie and runs off*  Jeanette 'Syrie' Ho replies: "As I have mentioned before, I'm too much of a chicken to draw full nudity. I uploaded the version that didn't cut off before it got that low by accident. ^^;; Oh, and yeah. I know that proportions are way off, that's another reason I was horrified to find that I uploaded the wrong picture. " | |
| 28 Oct 2003 | Caitlin Shae Baxter | Hm, very good, although yes the arm is a bit big. Although I don't agree with the other people, I sort of appreciated your discreetness with the naked guy... I figure, if you want to look at that kind of stuff there are about a million porn sites on the net. Anyway, I like it, you're obviously very good with a pencil. | |
| 28 Oct 2003 | Rhaine | It certaily doesn't look like someone forced you to do this pic! The one on the left is really cute, I like the way it brings a bit of shy character into him, not that I know what his true character is supposed to be. And I agree with the first commenter about the nude's arm, but I've noticed that in a lot of your pictures, and since I can't draw arms, hands, or anything that has to do with limbs, except for shoulders (well, they're the connecting bit, so I can boast about them, right?), I'm not gonna harp on ya.   Jeanette 'Syrie' Ho replies: "Arms and hands are the bane of my drawing existance." | |
| 28 Oct 2003 | Anonymous | Where is his d*ck? | |
| 18 Aug 2004 | Gerlinde Werdefroy | aaaaaargh! he as the anatomy of Ken! | |
| 28 Apr 2006 | Denise van de Walle | Yup. it's no-dick-ken. | |