| 20 Apr 2000 | Anon. | Uhm.. I typoed up there. That should be, "I like how you did.." | |
| 20 Apr 2000 | Antonette | I think this is pretty good. I like how to did the cracks in the mausoleum, or whatever that is, and the ground. | |
| 24 Dec 2000 | Joshua R. Pinkas | um, she has no protection, her arms are a bit thin to be a sword fighter, she has no foot wear on, and well, she just doesn't lok threatening. don't get me wrong i like the pic, the artwork is good, but i get bothered by seeing all these REALLY impracticle warriors, male and female, but well thats just my opinion, you sure do have alot more mobility like this, so thats always a pluss for a fighter... | |
| 16 Mar 2002 | Brianne Sladky <pepper06@hot...com< | I just think it's really pretty, her expression fits well with the stance she is in. Who cares if she isn't so warrior-like in this pic, she's relaxing. Perhaps her upper torso should be twisted a little more to be even with her legs. Good job. o.O | |
| 21 Nov 2002 | David Frank Daumit | The only thing I have to say about the picture is that I like it and think it's very well done. It may not be perfect, but it's attractive and creative, two qualities that make illustrations work for me.
As for the criticisms that she needs more muscle, clothing, et al, I think that's malarky for a couple of reasons: (1) This is fantasy! Realism can (and often should) be left by the wayside, at the whim of the artist. (2) For real-life examples of extremely potent warriors who bear little clothing/armor, go barefoot, and have normal physiques, one need only look at Zulus, early Greek soldiers, Picts/Celts, and modern day martial artists. | |
| 22 Jun 2004 | Joe | This one is nice i also liked how you did the shading in this picture | |