| 19 Nov 1999 |  Brian Keith Cooke | At that size, it must be difficult to find clothes to fit him. Or he just doesn't care for pants.  Good shading and musculature. | |
| 5 May 2000 |  insectoman | actually from the crotch area he is actually a she | |
| 10 Nov 2000 | I'M THE STUPID PERSON WHO CAME ON HERE TO NIT-PICK YOUR PICTURE EVEN THOUGH IT'S PRETTY COOL | IT HAS NO LEGS! But, anywho, it may be a cyclops but Joseph said that it was an ogre, so it's an ogre. He drew it; he knows. | |
| 10 Nov 2000 | The Nameless Person who put a coment on here.................. | It has no legs
| |
| 27 Nov 2000 | Wylee | Wether or not it is an ogre or cyclops....it doesn't matter. The art is not in it's name.....the beauty lies within the stencil. SHADDAP about the comments of species. Your loose tongues will be parted from your melevolent mouths. -Wylee | |
| 21 Jan 2001 | Mr. Steak | i think it sucks...need i say more? | |
| 2 Jan 2002 | Ken dale | No matter what you say about legands and and such a giant with one center eye is a Cyclops, no matter where you look. just rename the damn picture to stop this conversation. An artist can have personal vision, but it should fit into the realms of accepted lore.... i bet more of you would agree if he called it a fish!!!.... Cypher | |
| 19 Jan 2002 | Tenebrion | It's an Oyclops. But as for some friendly criticism (though it's coming from the wrong source here)it needs to be darker. Love the expression. | |
| 19 Jul 2004 | Laura Louise Adlington | I think it's cool, I don't care what it is! It's cool! Mr. Steak you're a fool! | |
| 3 Dec 2007 | Sethra | It's disgusting! A very ugly creature. You did an excellent job at drawing it and looks great (from an art point of view) but it's damn ugly! Great job! | |
All
rights are reserved for the work 'Maul the Ogre' by Joseph A. Stawski under
Elfwoods all rights reserved copyright policy
License
Categories: 
