| 20 Oct 2001 | Brian Lassen | Love dryads! Love this dryad! The pose is excellent, but I wonder why the creature isn't connected somehow with the tree - besides the hair? | |
| 12 Nov 2001 | Myra Sloan | This is beautiful. Its twisted all over the place, Nice details on the tree and facial design | |
| 2 Mar 2002 | Steven Tudor | Do I detect a Diterlizzi influence in this picture? | |
| 1 Oct 2002 | Emma Nordling | I love those hands! ghaaa! You are my hero..hm..well..amazing!  Joshua J. Parker replies: "*stands tall in a rediculously cheesy hero pose* Why thank you Emma! The hands, as well as the whole, were lots of fun. I'm glad you like!" | |
| 16 Jul 2004 | Shana Arielle Galano | Have you seen Queen of the Damed. well i have, and this reminds me of the queen. Its something about her face. | |
| 16 May 2006 | Anonymous | I just love your style,you have talent! | |
| 16 May 2006 | Anonymous | Your drawings must be one of my favourites here - and believe me when I say, I have seen alot! | |
| 7 May 2007 | Arjan | i always have problems with drawing leaves  you're leAVES LOOK GOOD ^^ :d | |
| 13 Oct 2007 | Vicki "Kiddalee" Nemeth | Are you kidding, Brian? She is totally connected with the tree! In her pose she is moulded to the shape of the trunk that she's leaning against. Just because she isn't corporally melded to it doesn't mean she isn't a part of it. Actually, that is exactly what I'd intended to comment on. I find it to be very good composition. | |
| 20 Oct 2007 | Natalie Hatch | Absolutely stunning! I love the way she molds right into the form of the tree. I think I've always had that kind of an image in mind for a dryad and was never able to fully translate it to my own drawings. Bravo! | |