| 20 Apr 2002 | Wraith | Kudos to you, I love Brooks' work and this is a good interpretation. | |
| 2 May 2002 | Telma Dias | Está aki um trabalho lindissimo!Não percebo porque é k há tantas pessoas a meterem defeitos,não percebem que isto não é um ser humano!Que gente tão inculta.
To the people that loves to give defects:This is not a human!!!Try to understant it! This is a wonderful work | |
| 14 Mar 2003 | Haldira | Dryads do not, and I repeat NOT, have furry backs! Nice pic otherwise  | |
| 7 Apr 2003 | Paulo Augusto F. Candeias | What's the problem with Furry dryads? lol, love the drawing! | |
| 7 Jun 2003 | McGiver | OK OK one word... NAIR!!! ever hear of it? Or for a more perment solution electro shock. | |
| 5 Feb 2004 | Ski | Should of shown more BUSH | |
| 12 Apr 2004 | leeviajero | Well, trees have moss and lichen. Why not dryads? | |
| 2 Aug 2004 | Anon. | Beautiful, but i don´t like the hair she has in the body. | |
| 6 Jun 2005 | Llamo | I agree with ski, next time draw the front !!! But judging by the amount of hair she has on her back, shes goin to need a serious bikini wax !! | |
| 28 Oct 2005 | Jon | If you get this answer this question for me. This is a drawing of "Willow" is it not? | |