| 21 Jul 2000 | Lyndell Stout | ...I hate to belabor the obvious...the hands are way too small...they should be laerge enough to cover the character's face when opened. ALso the neck seems a little too thick as well. Besides that, I am very impressed with the shading and you managed to capture his ethnicity quite well. | |
| 5 Oct 2000 | George Karl Kaufman | You have just incredible talent... especially in drawing the fabrics. I really think that his right hand (in the glove) is too small. | |
| 24 Oct 2000 | Deborah L. R. Dixon | Great details, the chain-maile is very well done. (I don't have the patience for any of that.  ) The hands do look a bit small. But otherwise it is well proportioned. Nice shading. Good background. Wow. | |
| 3 May 2001 | Jazz | *Kicks a Jazz up in the name place for that last post, grumbling and wishing they'd make name a compulsory field* | |
| 3 May 2001 | Anon. | I like the pic. I love the detail and the shading. As for critisisms I cant say anything anyone else hasnt said. Id love to see a Haseem Mk II though with critisms take on board!! Take heart, all the comments I heard seemed constructive rather than destructive. Look forward to seeing more of your work! | |
| 15 May 2001 | Abraham | Amazing chainmail. The etched name on the leather is excellent. His face is well done. | |
| 7 Jan 2003 | Andrew P. Morris | Very nice detail on the cloth of his surcoat and the links of the armor. Again you expressions are the commanding part of you composition. Well Done. | |
| 30 Dec 2003 | Erika | WOW! the clothes look so real and so does the face. sorry to say lad, but the fingers are a bit short. otherwise-great. | |
| 19 Dec 2004 | Pink | Hands are very small for a man | |
| 14 Nov 2005 | Linda Gock | Amazing shading | |