| 2 Nov 2001 | Hippyzarf | Very nice, I love the way you've drawn the dress. | |
| 23 Jan 2002 | Hettar7 | Nice. Good bright colors and clean lines. I like the way you colored her hair. The anatomy's good but her waist could be more of an hourglass and less like a rectangle. The hands and how they're positioned would be hard to duplicate in real life, though i like the idea of the position. Very nice overall. Good design on the dress by the way. | |
| 31 Mar 2002 | Anonymous | That's very beautiful... Man I wish I could draw like you! I'm jealous now... | |
| 1 Jul 2002 | Dana <hoverbug@hot...com> | cute pic! . . . but to correct your time period here, you've got a mix of eras going on. i'd call it Baroque or Rococo, being the late 1600's - 1700's, though it looks a bit Elizabethian too. =D yes, go ahead, smack me. heh | |
| 31 Oct 2002 | Sissa | Cooooooool , snow white-like dress, for me anyway | |
| 2 Jan 2003 | Anonymous | Definately not Victorian, though not quite Renaisance. Not anything historical, anyway, but it looks good just the same. Katherine82 | |
| 15 Nov 2004 | Bank Robbing Fool | Yep. Thats a pretty big Ball Gown | |
| 14 Apr 2005 | It's an orc | I think Fianna is right to claim the crinoline dress for herself ;-) ! Although of course both of you are cute, I think she's the one the dress really suits to. And have a look on what Dana wrote! I already said your Victorian is pretty close to Elizabethian, didn't I ? But no need to care: Anyway it's pretty  | |
| 12 May 2008 | Bunny boo | emmm it’s nice i meen very nice but you should of made the body more female like just a bitt you can tell she’s female butt the body dnt really show that the hand ant that felmale ever butt it’s good very nice i like it thou  | |