| 10 Feb 2001 |  Kendall Hagan | Oh dear..this is quite simple--yet so beautiful. Something about it..Can't quite place what.. Can't take my eyes from it. :  tares,transfixed.:: How long did THIS take? Actually this was a commissioned piece. She wanted the drawing to be pretty simple, it only took me about three hours over a couple days! | |
| 26 Mar 2001 |  Richard Thomas Lankes aka 'Dirty da Vinci' | And he calls it a sketch!? Geeze. I know people who would call this their masterpiece, and to him, it's just a sketch. And a VERY GOOD sketch at that. I don't even think this qualifies as sketch anymore. This should fall under 'masterpiece'... | |
| 1 May 2001 |  Coen de Moor | Very good! This kind of poses are very hard to draw, and you succeeded very well. | |
| 5 Oct 2001 |  Alicia N. Steeves | I actually looked at this one and went on past it to the next picture then came back to look again. It's the eye in the background, I think. I looked at the drawing, I saw the girl, the pose that would be impossible for any mere mortal to draw and went on. Then I suddenly went "wait..." and clicked back. I think it's the eye that brought me back. The idea of someone watching her give this drawing some sort of bizarre power. It's amazing. | |
| 6 Nov 2001 | Lyndell Antonio Stout | I like the concept and the all seeing eye back there adds a very interesting flavor to the drawing. | |
| 29 Jun 2005 |  Arthur L. Williamson | Awesome perspective! That's a difficult pose to pull off and that strange floating background eye... brilliant! | |
All
rights are reserved for the work 'No title' by Timothy Umstead under
Elfwoods all rights reserved copyright policy
License
Categories: 
