| 12 Oct 2001 | David Gardiner | You've departed a long way from photographic realism in this one, and I think it actually works better as a picture witwhen you don't read the written introduction. It seems to work better on a symbolic, metaphorical level than when you try to put it into a straightforward narrative. I would keep the picture and drop the introduction! Let each of us interpret it in our own way. It's a very striking image. You may interpret it in any way you want to. What I wrote is just how I interpret the picture. But maybe I should take the text away, to make it clearer that the picture could be interpreted in many different ways. | |