| 21 Jun 2001 | Lisa M. Fagan | Don't I know it! | |
| 23 Jun 2001 | Marcel Nyström | Yep, but don't let that stop you from trying to draw them! | |
| 8 Aug 2001 | Ida Sagberg | Oh, it's so beautiful! I love it!!! | |
| 12 Aug 2001 | Ami M Ténshi | Hey just because wings are hard doesn't mean it's not worth it. I hope you can finish this, it's really nice! | |
| 23 Aug 2001 | Jasmin Islam | I think that this picture is already completed in a sense ... the light, sketchy lines give a dream-like beauty and vagueness to the picture. I think it looks marvellous and suits the title perfectly the way it is! Not that that should stop you from modifying it the way you want. | |
| 9 Nov 2001 | Cristina M. Gnemmi | I loooove those wings!!! I love this pic!!! NEver stop drawing!!! i love ths shading and all that stuff. | |
| 5 Dec 2001 | Pawel Giera | hrmmm . . . where to start. Ok, I think I will start on the wings. I like how large they are now, it fits better with the body than on the small winged sketch  But, I would move their starting point up. right now they are coming out of the middle of her back hehe, not her shoulders. And, err they taper in a little too much where they would join her flesh. Beautiful shading job on them and the coloring is wonderful. I agree though, feathered wings can be a major pain! Ok err, is it really a she? If so . . . does she have a shirt on? If not she needs breasts  Also, the muscles in her arms are way to big at the shoulders. They should be more delicate in form being a female. Hair across the eyes can be tricky as well, but all in all it is a great picture! The shading below her is beautifully done! Great job! | |
| 20 Nov 2004 | Shelton b | Please remove the sketch and let this marvelous work stand on it's own. I see this angel "which can remain sexless", Looking at earth and thinking "Only God can help". Detail in the wings is not necessary. I am certainly not an acredited critic, but I think the work is breathtaking, and I am a 60 year old that has seen a few pics. | |