| 7 Aug 2006 | Faust XIII | Loading...Why do I always have to comment about these anti-nudity pics. Hey crazgirl184, I think that you should change your name to crazydementedfreak184. Oh yeah, you would have to be crazy to delete this pic because of the nudity! | |
| 5 Oct 2006 | Anonymous | Loading...Just plain awesome. | |
| 18 Jan 2007 | Random Art Viewer #345 named Dave | Loading...This is very well done. Not complaining, but I believe that making her naked here wasn't needed. I don't believe adding clothes would have made this worse, but having her naked doesn't ditract from the piece itself either.
There is a very fine line between naked art and porn, and this artist has NOT crossed that line. Bravo! | |
| 7 Dec 2007 | Luke ethridge bennett | Loading...I like it and yes i agree with every body else its not porn its art lo get used to it because alot of people draw this kind of thing so suck it crazygirl184 | |
| 1 Feb 2009 | Anon. | Loading...admazing very well done
| |
| 19 Mar 2009 | Anon. | Loading...hooters!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
| |
| 13 Aug 2011 | Jose Jr Alberto Santana DeJesus | Loading...I’m not offended nor complaining yo. love the pic. Great job. Please make so more if you can. Thanks.  | |
| 9 Sep 2011 | Fanterot | Loading...Congratulations on your courage in drawing a REAL female nude. So many artists shy away from showing a properly drawn vagina. So many alleged female "nudes" are drawn with a g-string, a leaf or a floating piece of cloth. Often we just get a pubic hair g-string rendered by a black triangle. Some opt out by turning the model sideways. With male nudes these subterfuges are not used and the penis is well in evidence. Even the old masters used the same dodges so it’s wonderful to see a talented modern artist depicting a female nude as she really looks. Well done! | |