| 11 Dec 2005 | Anonymous | Loading...Looks like that extinct rhino, Elasmotherium. Tiina 'Aarnia' Aumala replies: "I never really thought about it, but yes, Elasmotherium did have a similarily placed (albeit much more massive) horn. Any resemblance with extinct species is coincidental, though." | |
| 22 Dec 2005 | Anonymous | Loading... | |
| 12 Feb 2006 | Lina Morris | Loading...Nice. Although-a slight quibble-I believe boar have cloven hooves. (Something unlike a rhinoceros, though. It's been awhile since I had the dubious privilege of seeing pig's feet in the grocery store) Tiina 'Aarnia' Aumala replies: "Yes, the boar has cloven feet. But the monokeros has the feet of an elephant and the tail of a boar." | |
| 14 Sep 2006 | Former artist Martin L Krieger | Loading...Um... Myspace is a chat/message blog... I think i asked you that question... And once again completely ignored the subject i should have been talking about. Lovely monoceros, pliny would be proud... (if he wasnt busy turning in his grave from all the lisa frank interpretations of his and others serious discoveries) most peopole dont realise that many "fantacy" creatures were wholeheartedly belived to exist and had been discovered... Pop makes me sad. You make me happy. | |
| 1 Jan 2008 | Aleister Lam | Loading...From what I know, Pliny was merely echoing the description of Ctesias; who is actually the first person to ever wrote of the Monoceros. And he was probably describing what was mentioned earlier in the Bible, known then as the Re-em. Some researchers believe that the Biblical scholars was writing about an Aurouch, a sort of extinct bull, seen side-way with its horns superimpose on each other; and walah - you have the singled horned Monoceros. I was wondering have you read the Book of Unicorns by Odell Shepherd?Anyway your rendition of the Monoceros is very nicely done. | |
| 29 Apr 2008 | Charlotte Fire-Valkyrie Ahlgren | Loading...Seems to me Pliny was describing the Elasmotherium. I don’t know my history too well (in spite of majoring in paleontology) but I think they’d have been extinct by his times. The description could have survived, though, and why should they not have been called unicorns? Back in the Ice Age (when I’m guessing Elasmotherium lived) they didn’t know we’d have a completely different idea of what unicorns "should" be today. The painting is wonderful btw and certainly fits the description given!  | |
| 11 Aug 2008 | Chris | Loading...That mammal is not unknown, it is called the elasmotherium | |
| 22 Sep 2008 | Lady Grey | Loading...You might be interested to know that the Giant Unicorn is another name for Elasmotherium. It’s thought to have died out about 10,000 years ago, so I doubt it would have survived to Pliny’s time, but it could be that remains of the creature were occasionally found, thus leading him to make such a conclusion perhaps. Lovely artwork by the way. | |
| 28 Feb 2009 | Ross Ben Taylor | Loading...The description and your sketch reminds me a lot of a rhinoceros, which I think Pliny was describing in the first place (sorry to be unimaginative). Great sketch though, totally unlike so many other unicorn interpretations! | |
| 7 Apr 2009 | Lucy Bert | Loading...It’s awesome! Very powerful looking. | |