| 23 Nov 2002 | Jolie | Loading...Okay, *I'll* be the pervert who first comments on this! ;P The proportions look perfect to me, but then I'm artistically challenged beyond what could be considered a joke! And I like that her tail is coming from where her tail bone would be - I think that's pretty nifty, hehe. *shrug* It's a nice picture, but the feet and the hair could use work... also, with the detail you usually give to faces, this one's a little below par, but I still like it.  AV Salois replies: " Thanks, chica. " | |
| 24 Nov 2002 | San3 | Loading...The proportions look perfect to me, and even though often I can be artistically challenged when I'm trying to make my own hands behave, I *do* know the rules for proportions  Her head may be *slightly* big, but if it is it's not much--I am not sure at all if it even is! And besides, real people's proportions are flexible from the standards anyway. She could use some muscle definition in her legs and arms, and possibly across her shoulders, because they are bearing her weight and would be flexed, but it's really not a big deal, and I think the other details and the background make it less noticeable  She's purrfectly beautiful  AV Salois replies: "Ooh, muscle definition! I have a book about musculature, etc, but I haven't had the courage to look at it yet (it's so intimidating). I may look at it, and then try this pose, etc, again! Ta-ever-so for the comment/suggestions! " | |
| 14 Nov 2004 | Caralho | Loading...Nice pic. Real women should be this sexy, and should have this sexualy submissive posture. | |
| 10 Dec 2004 | Dana ~SPIRIT in FLAMES~ <danahorse@hot...co | Loading...Nice, but her hair is wierd... | |
| 24 Jan 2005 | Ulrika Abrahamsson | Loading...I like this picture. It's very good! You've done a nice job on the shading. I agree on the other comments about the hair and the face... Well done! Keep up the good work! // Ulrika | |