"Simple Pleasures..." by Albert Thomas Colon

COME ON people, it's a piece of art, not a religious debate. All that matters is that the angel is attractive and drawn well.

YOU WANNA KNOW WHAT I THINK ABOUT ANGELS?? AND ALL OF YOU LISTEN UP NOW OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES!! **ANGELS ARE WHAT THE ARTIST DECIDES FOR THEM TO BE** The pictures of them are not out there for the world to say that they are wrong. They are there for an artist to draw them and for others to enjoy them. If you don't like this or you think it's wrong, why are you wasting your time on something you don't like? True, REAL angels may be sexless, but this one isn't necessarily real and she is a female angel. A very beautiful one at that. But from one artist to the next, her arms are a little short though...

I lost da plot of da convo a loooong time ago, mainy by da anon on da 27th dec 02. Great pic, sweet but simple, really cool!!!
Soz to da artist dat dis pic is bein usd as da subject of a discussion, its a good peice of work.
Im a bit of a hypocrit, though, and i want to add my peice to da discussion to try and end it coz its confusin and anoyin me.
I think dat angels are more of a feeling, if u get wot I mean, and a way of God sendin his messanges. As sed b4, in da bible sum1 has dun dem wiv bodies and wings and names and stuf as a representation 2 make it les confusin, angels hav no sex nor a body. Albert T. Colon (hello) has just drawn da angel as a woman wiv wings to represent an angel(i think, correct me if im wrong)and to get da meanin through. He cant hav drawn da angel wiv no bodie, otherwise der is no pic.
Let me now sum dis up 2 end da discussion.
It's a gr8 pic about an angel relaxin, and no1 could hav dun a btr job.

I Like the way it is busy in the background but not cluttered to the point that you dont know who or what is the center, great shading and I would love to see a colored version if you ever come out with it. Keep up the wonderful work. ^-^

Ooooh, what a conversation... I bet most of the people who like the picture are men... (cough, cough) if you were a woman though you wouldn't like this picture as much (@ least for most women) but hey men are attracted to women and women to men so i can't be totally ticked at the picture (guys are just toooooo sexual though)

OK, this is totally ridiculous. Now, I am christian and all that, but seriously, the one thing I hate the most about being one is how friggin dogmatic almost every big christian is. This PIECE OF ARTWORK is not a representation of an actual deity. This is an awesome work of art, and I have no idea why you guys would want to completely ruin it with religeous crap. IF YOU DON"T LIKE IT THEN DON'T LOOK AT IT

I love it. Who cares how "biblicly correct" it is. Whatever. Don't let their comments affect you. They don't mean anything. One guy didn't even put his name on his comment so he can't believe that strongly in what he says. Once again, your awesome. Love ya.

She is beautiful, and I think it’s a wonderful abstract form of what the bible says. I mean, i’m an aethiest, but I have read the bible. (one of the reasons i’m an aethiest) But she’s beautful!

ok everyone he is right angels do swim with us just not in ur lifetimes and who cares about the ****in bible its wat he thinks angels look like ok not wat the ******* bible says k

Beautiful.