| Date | Name | Comment | | | 13 Apr 2007 | Storm ´Shadow´ Blakley | Loading...i really like this! i’m trying to figure out where it’s going, but i know it’s a waste of time, since only you know. how do all the characters tie into one another? it’s like a tapestry, and my favourite people are Kethe and Rosalbe, and i love the names! my absolute favourite thing in this whole story, though, has to be the way you described death; i’ve tried, but it’s harder than most people think. i am looking forward to finding out where this is going! A. Setliffe replies: " ^_^ thank you! Ah, it’s never where it’s going, but how it gets there!
why those two? just for my curiosity. I like to know what I do right and what I don’t, and honestly those are the two I need my readers to like.
a personified Death is tricky. The concept that Death appears to each person in a different way, though, is an idea I gleaned from George MacDonald’s "the Princess and Curdie" where there is a character who can change shape, but how other people see her ultimately depends on them. Glad you liked and thank you for reading! I am trying to keep this story going, but time will tell. " | |
| 27 Jan 2008 | Julia W. Harme | Loading...this story is very well written! i love the whole idea. cant wait to read more. A. Setliffe replies: "Thank you! Glad you like it! I am going to re-write this section first, (it needs a few tweakings I think) but after that I hopefully I will be able to start uploading more." | |
| 28 Mar 2008 | Twyla Bendyna | Loading...wow! This is awesome. I love stories that have no cut&clear good/evil and this one is perfect A. Setliffe replies: "I think "perfect" is a definite overstatement, but thank you for the compliment! glad you like it! I enjoy telling two or more sides of a story... and I like telling stories about People, and both of those things force me to avoid cardboard-cutout Good and Evil stereotypes. thank you for reading ^_^" | |
| 3 May 2008 | Nick Canning | Loading...*sort of as-I-read commentary* Best kind in my opinion ^_~ Not sure which one is your newest, so I just chose this one ’cus of the mods’ choice. the newest is actually an older work re-written. this one is in need of some re-writing too (especially as the pally is now carries a pole-arm rather than a sword...) but then everything always does... I love the alliteration at the start of the second paragraph. Very[/] nice. :] Maybe try to divide the thoughts from the rest of the story with italics? A bit confusing, perhaps. aye, I need to find some way to separate necromancer’s running internal crazy from the rest of the story. Italics might be the best option. The description of the summoning is really evocative. I can see it perfectly in my mind. ( Blood, dirt, leaves and grass, drops of rain all meshed together to give it shape as it stepped forward in the body of a giant man with four arms and two great seeming-feathered wings.) The word "seeming" is probably not necessary (oh, looking closer, actually, did you mean "seemingly"?) I thought at first (not reading carefully I suppose) that it said "great-seeming". Anyways, [/nitpick] I like nitpicks. I am actually wavering as to whether or not to keep this part of the scene or whether to have the necromancer run before he sees it, and deal with the physical manifestation of these beings later... there are reasons for both, and I really am on the fence with it... to keep or not to keep, that is the question... whether tis better in the scene to have them... ect. ect. *too tired to deal in iambic pentameter*The sentence Gregan recovered first, calling out his demon’s name drawing in power to kill his attacker while her ally and his struggled, but as he made to cast his spell, nothing happened. sounds a bit clumsy and run-on to me, especially "calling out his demon’s name drawing in..." could use a comma, or could have been restructured to start a new sentence there. aye, very true... again, it hinges on whether or not I keep this part of the scene... *bites lip*Oh my... I like the description of the combat. I don’t think I’ve ever read anything quite like that (the paragraph ending with Gregan’s (sort-of) suicide). thank you! that is encouraging. combat tends to give me problems, as I can visualize it ok but have a hard time describing it. I’m glad to know this one works outside my head.Maybe a better word could have been chosen than ’misted", which seems kind of redundant in light of the rest of the sentence. hmm... but how do ghosts get from one place to another without vanishing and reappearing? Sorry for being nitpicky (again :]) but there’s a spelling error here: He spat on the bodies as he climbed over the. Nitpicks are good. they are the main reason I post stuff... the "I like your story" comments are nice and encouraging, but they don’t make me a better writer. nitpicks do, and I thank you for them. "Ungrateful dirt-dolls" is a great line. hehe. ^_^ Nothing much to say, up till the passage after the word "Ghostborn" maybe "own" is the wrong word here... "Feel", or "hold onto" maybe? perhaps.I like the juxtaposition of the intense, over-the-top battle scene with the equally intense and incredibly arrogant necromancer, and the quiet cottage scene... A. Setliffe replies: "^_^ " | |
| 3 May 2008 | Nick Canning | Loading...This is a very well-written scene (if I can describe it as that, that’s often how I think of my own work, as a sort of painting of an event (like how a landscape is often described as a scene) with words). High epic fantasy is not really my thing, because often it’s just taking archetypes (both character and scenario, and even dialogue) and rehashing them, so I’m glad it’s not all like that. Reminds me a bit of my own story I have here, in some ways. :] I will have to put your library on my list of must-sees. I like... how to put it... I like taking the archetypes, even the stereotypes and cliches and twisting them, just enough, or breaking and re-creating them until they mean something again, even if it’s just to me... the reason is that I think they exist for a reason... I think they exist because they strike a chord in the human mind and heart somewhere, which is why they become archetypes and cliches in the first place, but that they are used so often and so... pedantically that they lose the meaning they should have had, like the word "awesome" used to mean "pretty cool" instead of awe-inspiring... if that makes sense. This is why, for the most part, I use "standard" races rather than creating my own from scratch, but alter them to be just different enough to be seen, and why I set up stories where I can explore the characters and find out for my self how just a little twist in an archetype can make all the difference in the world. ...heh, but I could talk you to death about this. I bet you didn’t bargain for that. sorry. it’s something that interests me greatly. This story is not intended to be a normal "good vs evil" conflict though, at all... and if I can work it well, which I am not sure I can, it won’t have the medieval feel to it that most "high fantasy" is known for. I don’t think I have your talent for description, though. Not yet, anyway. for all I know you are just being humble ^_~ anyhow, sometimes I have a tendency to overdo it. Every writer has their faults and talents, though... I’ve never seen a writer, published or otherwise, who didn’t have some weakness in their writing, which is comforting to me... though Alyssa George comes frighteningly close... *is in awe of crazy aussie*Yay, more cool juxtaposition! Life and death. Neat. this story is aaaaallll about life and death. ^_~That is terrifying. I love the fresh perspective on death you portray. I’m so used to cheery Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett Deaths. *fangirl squeak* Bill Door! ahem... sorry... LOVE Pratchett’s grim reaper. Death... is a complicated one in this story. You’ve already seen her twice in two very different ways through the eyes of two very different people, and I promise you will see her again through more eyes than those. "wind-drawn tears." That is a cool phrase. thanks! I didn’t know how else to describe it."and his burden became uplift.". Do you mean "uplifted"? Still a bit clumsy, imo. "burden was lifted" perhaps? it’s a hard thing to describe... like... that moment where the wind blows against you so hard that it’s almost as if you yourself have become lighter? as if you could take off and fly, but not quite? ...tough one..."bench of stone". Maybe the word "bench" can mean other things, but I pictured a stone version of a wooden bench. Bit confusing.... Better wording needed. it may be a southernism. it’s what we call a level stone outcropping. it can be fairly small or too large to scale, like a small cliff but... has a different visual... english really has lost most of it’s land-describing words... it’s sad... I will see if I can fix it, though.Wait, it’s a sword? Ohhhh.... Either it needs to be clearer, or I’m just dense, I’m not sure :]. well it’s actually going to be a halberd-type pole-arm once I revise this, but yeah... Gypsy is the nickname for an angel-possessed paladin weapon. I am considering whether or not to have Tam seemingly talking to himself or whether to keep Gypsy’s half of the dialog...Like I said before, I wish I could describe like that. Good job with the tree (maybe it’s because I’m a city kid). I am too, ironically, but a city that’s very close to a lot of woods and has a lot of trees. I love trees... and I love magnolias, off which this thing is modeled. what I really love, though, is what is beneath the trees in this story. *impish grin* I really especially like the paragraph starting with "Wood was easy to come by on the forest floor..." *is impressed* A. Setliffe replies: "O_o" | |
| 3 May 2008 | Nick Canning | Loading...*shivers* and it all starts to tie together... very cool. I think the child could have been a bit better described. I didn’t really feel the horror that the paladin was. It weakens the scene a fair bit, unfortunately. *nods* I am very not happy with that part at present. ...but then a lot of this needs re-working. I usually go through about five or six serious revisions before I am happy with the beginning of a story, and this is only about the third revision of this one. thanks for the info, I will put it to work ^_^ The dialogue in the scene with the healer and the boy feels a bit awkward/stilted, even if the boy is meant to be seen as a bit weird/damaged by his experiences. Kethe is... Kethe. no other word for him. weird/damaged doesn’t really describe him as much as alien. I know what you mean, though. the scene you mention isn’t right and I know it. Not sure how to fix it yet... but hopefully I will figure something out. I am open to suggestions. Finished ... wow. I’m not exactly certain what happened. Did he take over the life of that boy? who, the necromancer take over kethe? nah. necromancer doesn’t know kethe exists... yet ^_~ all he did was jump into the pool of water and loose 143 years.I was going to suggest, upon reading the start, that there should be some background, but you play very fair with the clues throughout the story. I try... I tend to want to tell too much (you probably noticed by my comments) so I hold myself back from info-dumping and try to tell what needs to be told over the course of the narrative. it’s good to be told whether or not it works, though. The necromancer and the paladin are both a little archetypal for my tastes, as I said before. Tam is as he needs to be, so there’s not much to be done about that... I need him to seem/be human enough, but... yeah. I will say that he isn’t one of the protagonists, so that may help. As for the necromancer... I hope he becomes less so as one gets to know him... really, he isn’t so much "evil" as he is mentally ill, and I will be going into that more and more as the story progresses. still, as I mentioned earlier, I do tend to skirt very near the archetypes on purpose, so it might not get better for you reading this. I hope you enjoyed it regardless, though. if nothing else, I do enjoy coming at a story "from both sides" as it were, so this is a tale about people, not about an epic struggle between "team good" and "team evil." Great description, again :] thank you ^_^ setting this story in something close to my own experience helps a lot with that.The story is very neat and thought-provoking. thought-provoking already? wow.Thanks for posting this, I enjoyed it :] A. Setliffe replies: "thank you for reading and giving me such wonderful and useful comments!" | |
| 3 May 2008 | Nick Canning | Loading...had to divide it up into three (well, four now), sorry :]
also, oh my I am rubbish with the html here I guess. I hope you don’t mind too much...
The comment character limit is the bane of all who wish to comment on stories... we hates it, precious... nasty limit, yes... don’t worry about the html. it takes getting used to. I am still not entirely used to this form. to change font colors you have to capitalize all of COLOR. like this: <COLOR=red> </COLOR> only with the [ ] brackets, of course.Missing:[/color] | |
| 7 Jun 2009 | Stephanie Rennolds | Loading...AHA! And we see Kethe... interesting. =D nope, not Kethe ^_~ Interesting that you thought so. Em, when she first read this, aparently thought so too. I am working on making the person’s age clearer in a re-write. This is Kethe’s will-be-Master. Kethe’s not going to be born for over 100 years after this little bit of chaos ^_~ [Sorry, you know me and constructive criticism do not get along well.] A. Setliffe replies: "we will work on that ^_~ muahahaha thank you for reading, though. *hugs*" | |
| 17 Oct 2009 | David Michael | Loading...“Nowhere was safe, as was aptly proven the next moment.” Stood out as an unnecessary sentence, especially the second part of it. *nods* aye, you are absolutely right. This has been severely revised again, and that sentence removed. It has actually changed quite a bit, but I decided not to re-submit it because I hope that one day I might be able to get this story published. ...maybe. ...possibly. “She was not young, but sturdy, not pretty” Sturdy doesn’t feel like the right contrast to young; neither is pretty, but it makes a little more sense. Perhaps “She was not young or pretty, but sturdy...” instead. aye, I see what you mean. “The necromancer’s body shuddered in answer” Gregan’s or the narrator’s? the narrator is third-person limited omniscient, but the character whose thoughts are recorded is the necromancer. Gregan is a warlock, and if he shudders at the presence of the fiend he summoned, the necromancer doesn’t see it. I would give the necromancer a name for simplicity’s sake, save that the fact that he is too paranoid to tell anyone his name is somewhat important to the story. “as the summoned fiend bent the world around it like a cloak” Eh...what? Since the actual appearing of the fiend would probably be seen, it feels awkward that you don’t say anything about it. And the phrase “bent the world around it like a cloak” is very poetic, but rather obscure. Is it bending light around it to distort images? What’s it doing? in the prologue as it now stands, the necromancer sees neither fiend nor angel. ’bent the world around it like a cloak’ is maybe not the right way to say it, but what first comes to mind, to me, is ’pushes its way into the world like someone shoving their fist into a balloon’ and as you can see, that’s not quite ’in tone’ with this story ^_~ The idea is that the Fiends and the Angels are part of a dimension that is apart from the physical world in which the humans live. They can only enter the human world by possessing something there, though that possession can involve wrapping themselves in matter. Before, when I had this to where the angel and fiend were seen by the necromancer, there was a descriptions of both of them pulling leaves and twigs, and mud, and rain in to give themselves shape. To me, that looks like someone swirling a cloak around themselves... the necromancer has seen this before, once or twice, and can feel the way the reality of the world seems to bend when it happens... *lets out a long puff of breath* this is why I battle info-dumping so much... I have more information than is good for me. I have to explain all of that with as much subtlety as possible in this prologue, and I chose for the fiends and the angels to be ’off screen’ because I don’t want them seen this early on in the tale. I want them to remain somewhat mysterious. If you have insight into how to describe what an extra-dimensional being cloaking itself in matter would feel like, I would appreciate the help very much. “There were dead in the river, but he saw none there living” Awkwardly phrased. For the second phrase, why not just “but none alive”? it is a bit of an archaic form, but ’none alive’ doesn’t sound quite right because of whose thoughts are being followed. The necromancer categorizes people into living and dead, and he prefers the latter (because he can control them more easily). Would ’none living’ be better? or ’No living?’From the other comments it sounds like many details have been cut from this. yes... Is it still in progress or under construction? Very. This is my primary project at present. At any rate, it is very interesting. The setting is almost palpable, and suits the subject matter very well. thank you. I am working on making the setting its own character (though without making it intrude or overwhelm the other elements). I’d mainly like a clearer idea of the what’s on which side (fleeting references to demons, angels, and fiends makes it sound like these are on the side of the peasants, which raises a million other interesting questions). hmm, interesting. Is it not clear that the fiend is summoned by Gregan and that it rebels and vanishes? Or that the angel is summoned by the peasant? That was what I intended to be understood, and if it’s not clear enough, I need to work on it. The necromancer mistrusts both fiends and angels, but then he tends to think of himself as his own side. But as for the context for what’s happening, that I was able to piece together very well, and very effectively. You avoided an info dump and made information seem fairly organic the way it was revealed. Well done. It’s an atmospheric prologue, and I quite enjoyed it. I look forward to reading more. A. Setliffe replies: "thank you very much! I will gladly send you what I have, if you want to read it. No pressure on reading it right away, of course, but I have an overhauled prologue and several short chapters. " | |
| 4 Nov 2009 | David Michael | Loading...As for the fiend cloaking itself in matter, the details of it pulling twigs/leaves/stuff from the area and reshaping it around itself sound pretty good to me. Hm...I think I get the image now, and the meaning of the phrase "bent the world around it" such that it too seems okay now. You could describe the air bulging or something. Or some peculiar sound or odor associated with the moment of possession. Hm...just some ideas. something for me to think on, certainly. I plan to show the process later, though not quite yet. And I take back the comment about "he saw none there living" being awkward. It is perfectly valid as an archaism, and I remember that I do in fact like archaic flourishes of an elegant, and not fake sort. It is not awkward on a second reading. Keep it as is. *chuckles* archaic flourishes are fun, aren’t they? I will have to be careful to avoid them for most of the text because the tone of the other characters is different from the necromancer’s, but for his narration, I like having a bit of leeway. It also allows me to play with the fact that, when he comes back, he is from a different century, and therefore archaic ^_^ Since I didn’t know what the rules of this game were, I wasn’t going to assume that a peasant could summon an angel, as that suggests powers equal to the necromancers. Which is generally not common in most fantasy. ha! that is very true. poor peasants. It will become clear relatively quickly that this story centers around ’common’ folk, though without their official nobility, they are no longer peasants. But you have a different world, which seems to play by some different rules, and I’m perfectly willing...nay, excited...to see what you do with them. If you could find a way to perhaps allay some of the natural assumptions a reader raised on mainstream fantasy would have (regarding what peasants can and can’t do, and possibly the stereotype of the average peasant not having the courage or ability to single-handedly challenge a necromancer), that might be nice. hopefully the story will bear that out soon, but in this section, the necromancer’s perspective is the strongest, and he doesn’t think much of the ’dirt dolls.’ ^_~ Otherwise, reveal info at your own pace. Often stories are at first confusing that throw the reader into action (esp. action with lots of history and significance behind it), but after the reader perseveres for a bit, they begin to catch on. I trust that will happen here as well. so far, only those really used to the fantasy genre have gotten much out of this intro... in a way I want to make it more accessible, but then again I don’t want to ’tell’ too much, as that slows down the action. alas for such conundrums! So feel free to send what you have my way, whenever you fee like it. I probably will not get to it right away, but perhaps on a weekend, or Thanksgiving break or somesuch, I can settle down a bit and enjoy it. Best wishes! A. Setliffe replies: "Thanks! I can’t recall, is your e-mail on your page or not? I never expect anyone to get to my work immediately, as I am bad about getting to others’ works quickly too ^_~ " | |
| Page: [1] 2 |
|