| 31 Oct 1999 | Debbie A. Bell | Loading...Of course, I'm biased on this one. I love it  I'm just as curious as you to hear the rest of this interesting poem. | |
| 11 Oct 2000 | Mikhail Shvyryev | Loading...The imagery is beautiful, but the overall style is too verbose to be called a poem, even a free-verse one. The poetry is rarely supposed to be that descriptive, traditionally poets prefer to play with abstract descriptions, allowing the reader to think what he wants. 54 lines is just too much. | |
| 28 Oct 2000 | Author | Loading...I'm not quite sure what to say to this.
On one hand, it helped me think about my style and how it differs from more commonly accepted writing. On the other hand, I didn't agree with the assessment at all.
What you see is what you get in this regard. The only way my style could change significantly is if my personality did as well. So, enjoy what you can.  | |
| 15 May 2002 | Navah Rosensweig | Loading...I like this a tremendous amount. It gives me hope . . . | |
| 22 Aug 2002 | Maria C. Stromberg | Loading...I might just end up commenting on every poem...  I don't agree with Michael, each poet has his own style and some are more explicit than others. This is a bit like T.S. Eliot's style in places, not the subject matter of course, but the way you deal with it. Anyways, this is a beautiful piece of work. | |
| 15 Nov 2002 | Alice Muffin Girl Smith | Loading...Hey, I like this. It's like one of those stupid epic poems we have to read in english... Ah, minus the stupid. Good use of imigery, &, umm, whatever else poems are usually described with (I usually stray away from poems and poem commenting, but I liked this!) The last few lines in particular... they add depth. *smiles* A very fine read. | |