| 22 Jan 2007 | ChingMan Wong | Loading...It's about time someone pointed that out. Rachel E. Johnstone replies: "I think plenty of people have been pointing it out - have you seen some of the critic people put on the Net since the films came out? Phew!!" | |
| 21 Apr 2007 | Birdy | Loading... | |
| 8 Sep 2007 | Ruler of the bumblebees | Loading...Good picture, who’s glorfindel? *hides head in shame* Rachel E. Johnstone replies: "Go to the back of the class!! Or go to the Encyclopaedia of Arda website, for example, and read a few character bios " | |
| 30 Nov 2007 | Deborah Flyinghorse Sutherlin | Loading...LOL Thanks for the laugh Rachel! Poor Glorfindel.... he got completely ignored in the movie...but then so were many lovely LOTR characters! Misery loves company? Rachel E. Johnstone replies: "To be fair...there are a LOT of characters in LOTR and putting them all in would just have confused the viewers who don’t know the books and made the film at least an hour longer. " | |
| 30 Nov 2007 | KassiAnne Cox | Loading... | |
| 9 Feb 2008 | A. ~^*Skarbog*^~ den Hollander | Loading...hihi, this is so good..... let her be punished for what she did! Rachel E. Johnstone replies: "Thank you. Daddy will make her pay, don’t worry about that." | |
| 3 Aug 2008 | LOTR Superfan | Loading...Hahaha! That’s great! Some of the best cartoon LOTR up here! Even though I knew it was supposed to be Glorfindel I still thought that scene was cool in the movie. At least it made scense. Did you know in a cartoon version of LOTR they had Legolas doing that bit? Oh, the shame! Rachel E. Johnstone replies: "Do you mean Bakshi’s animated film that suddenly skipped half of the story? Anyway, thank you for your comment - you must be the first to comment here who didn’t mind Glorfindel being replaced! " | |
| 14 Nov 2008 | Mie 'Stormwing' Bendiksby | Loading... | |
| 28 Nov 2008 | TolkienFan | Loading...AND SHE DESERVED IT!!!! GOOD JOB!!!   Rachel E. Johnstone replies: "Thank you. How many thousand years must she suffer to make up for it?!" | |
| 30 Nov 2008 | Gemma Levitt | Loading...Lol I still love this picture- It makes me laugh everytime I see it which is great for when I’m having a bad day. I’ve always found that I preferred Glorfindel to Legolas (not sure why really given he makes some fairly daft comments during their disscussion of the ring, but hey is is generally just more interesting because there is so little about him) so I was a tad dissapointed that he was replaced by Arwen in the film. I can understand why they did it though as Arwen really has very little to do until the end of the book! A brilliant take on the situation. Rachel E. Johnstone replies: "Thank you, Gemma. Maybe you preferred Glorfy because Legolas didn’t do an awful lot in the book except shriek like a girl when the Balrog turned up?! ;D" | |