| 30 Nov 2004 | Michelle Gonzalez | Loading...Actually I don't agree with the other about the back, but the arm that collecting the dew looks odd like it's twisted wrong. But other than that little nitpick its wonderful. Beautiful male. | |
| 30 Nov 2004 | Jeniece N. McDonald | Loading...Whoa... this picture is stunning. The detail and the shading is fantastic. I really like your idea. My two nitpicks are that the anatomy on the back seems off, either that or the muscles too defined compared to the rest of his body (but I think it's the anatomy). Also, the shading seems really dark in some spots - the two I especially noticed were his back and his calf. The depth seems off, and if you were going for dynamics, I think you should have used darker paper so that you could have deep shadows without the lighting looking weird. But that's just my personal opinion, and don't get me wrong because I think this picture's awesome. The skin tones, the water, the composition... *cookie for you* Oh yeah, and unless someone beat me to it.. *first comment dance* | |
| 1 Dec 2004 | Anne Marie Filiatreault | Loading...His back looks a little overly-muscular for a faerie in my opinion, but other than that I love the whole concept. I think this should have won a Mod's choice. The shading is great. | |
| 28 Jan 2009 | Renée van den Kerkhof | Loading...Nice anatomy. It is I who can not draw any male anatomy, or even female anatomy at all. Boohoo. Cheers for you though, it is a lovely picture, that has to be mentioned. | |