| 23 Aug 2002 | Glenna | Loading...She's not exactly girl shaped try bringing in the waist. Don't know if it will work though Theodore Roy Hellqvist replies: "Yeah, thanks Glenna. Maybe that'll help to bring out some hips, but I don't know if there's enough material in the right places.Ted" | |
| 1 May 2003 | Jaclyn C. Cifranic | Loading...I like your carving style; it reminds me of Native American sculptures or other works of early civilations. I agree with Glenna; I think you need to bring out the shape of the feminine body more. She looks too masculine. ~ Kiki-Bird | |
| 3 May 2003 | S 'faething' VanDenEng | Loading...Oh wow! She looks almost like a Fae creature! - which is a complement from me... at any rate, i have to disagree with your first commentators... she looks positively feminine to me! Who could mistake her for a boy? Really! I just think she needs more detailing on her legs for definition. That's the only critique I can come up with for you. It's brilliant! I'd say she's done. Theodore Roy Hellqvist replies: "Yeah, I guess we all have different ideas about what constitutes feminine, masculine, etc. For me, she has a lot fo the right parts but the torso and general posture still aren't right yet. Possibly, never will be---see trajic developements when I get a chance to poste again--- also I began to run out of material, especially in parts of the legs. That is I agree with your comment about the legs but I think there's noroom left to do what's needed. More soon I hope. T" | |
| 2 Apr 2004 | Sus | Loading...I saw more faery thn angel as well.. I love the wings, and the hair.
I was sort of thinking about a more defining waist as well, but at this point I think it would make her too thin looking.
And I'm not entirely sure about her posture..is she sitting, or standing.. she doesn't quite seem to be doing wither one.
Still, I agree with the comment about, she does seem to work as is. | |